Uhhhhh...ya know...Ummmm...

Regarding last evening's gubernatorial debate...

"Uhhhh...ya know...Ummmm". That is all Nut-Meg could say when she was forced to go off her agendized talking points. The smart panel wouldn't let her get away with it and she seemed surprised by that. At least THEY knew what THEIR job was. From the very first question, which she ignored as she dove into her own agenda, it was clear that the evening was going to be a hoot.

While Jerry was straightforward and often comedic in his responses, Nut-Meg was taken aback by the gall of anyone who questioned the significance of her often rambling replies.

She pushed the idea that she wants to de-regulate and de-tax corporations so that they will bring their business back to California. Really? Those silly Republicans still think the voters are stupid. Seems to me that idea only serves to answer the question as to why she has spent so much of her own money on this campaign. Dare I say it? I am sure, should she be elected, she will reap HUGE bonuses ($$) from various entities who are in the same club as she is so devoted to. Keep in mind, the entire Bush administration belonged to that club, too, and as they de-regulated and de-taxed on a federal level, the economy that affected us normal folks sank into a pit that we will be lucky to climb out of in 15 years. While the ultra rich get ultra richer.

Nut-Meg seems soooo tough on immigration....yet this morning's news tells us that she employed an illegal alien as a housekeeper for nine years. Her response to the question was that she fired the housekeeper the minute she learned of her illegal status. News sources tell us something different. The housekeeper got fired only when Nut-Meg decided to run for office and figured (correctly) it might cause a bump in the road to the Capitol. Bump, bump, bump.

All of the above, coupled with the fact that she didn't bother to register to vote until just recently, tells me she isn't exactly in the race because she cares about California.

Jerry, on the other hand, came off as a more than knowledgeable Californian who has always spoke his mind truthfully, even when his ideas weren't popular. He was against the death penalty but invoked the law while he was in office because...well...it was the law. He told us that thousands and thousands of jobs would be created if California would lead the nation in green energy. With that in mind, please remember, Jerry spoke of environmental issues 40 years ago when everyone deemed it a politically crazy move. Keep in mind that during his last tenure as Governor, he refused to live in the Governor's mansion, choosing instead to reside in a small and much less expensive and energy efficient apartment across the street from the Capitol. He also insisted on driving his own rather old economy car at the time rather than opting for limos or Cadillacs, the standard of the day for elected officials.

I wonder what Nut-meg drives? (Besides driving all of us little peeps crazy.)

Til next time.....

FANTASYLAND, REPUBLICAN STYLE

I am so tired of Republicans saying they want to get back to the values and ideals of our original Constitution. The only constitution they want to get back to is the one espoused by the Bush Administration.

The Republicans would like to get back to:

1. Tax cuts and loopholes for the Ultra-Rich. (Isn't their reasoning a bit obvious?)
2. No national healthcare. And no limits to healthcare costs or health insurance costs. No regulation of pharmaceutical companies. (I guess the religious right thinks that PRAYING for good health should be enough.)
3. More deregulation of investment corporations. (Does anyone remember what this did to the economy? Oh, wait...we are still reaping the rewards of that!)
4. Deregulation of oil companies. (Hello, BP, welcome aboard!)
5. Less environmental oversight. (The sky isn't falling, after all. The sky IS getting mighty hot and mighty grey, peeps!)
6. A really good war, some really good torture techniques, and we'll have 'em right where we want 'em. (Really? How's that workin so far?)

Personally, I really don't think we have to worry about the Republicans. Regardless of what the media is tossing our way (proving that Fox Schmooze is an entertainment channel...not a news channel), I doubt the Reps have the sense to change their game plan. Think about it...they've got Palin (yikes), Gingrich (double yikes), and who is that guy from Utah? They are pandering to The Tea Party at every turn, hoping to round them up and stick an elephant pin on their lapel before Election Day. Some Tea Party candidates may be winning a few primaries but the American people will never allow those loony tunes to take charge of anything. Especially since all they do is whine without a plan. And even more problematic, there is nary a black, brown or purple person in the bunch. A whole lotta grey at those rallies, tho.

Republicans will play their cards exactly as they did in the last election...their fantasy stories and rumors won't make any more sense this time then last time. Their straw-grabbing will be greatly overshadowed by the Dems who will (mostly) tell it like it is. From Healthcare to Iraq to The Economy...Obama is fulfilling promises. You may not agree with every little thing he does, but he IS making headway toward an America that we knew 10 years ago. (It took 8 long years to get us in this mess...it will take the Obama adminstration about that long to get us out of it.)

WTF?

I am a registered independent but I watched the debate on Wednesday between Senator Boxer and Ms. Fiorina.

Obviously, Ms. Boxer won. No doubt about that. Ms. Fiorina came off as just another money-motivated Republican not unlike her friend, Ms. Whitman (more on that bitch in future posts). I predict some panic-induced Hail Mary moves by Ms. Fiorina's campaign as we draw closer and closer to Election Day. Enough said about Ms. Fiorina.

I also, however, have some problems with Senator Boxer. I checked her voting record and although Ms. Boxer has represented my views on many issues and bills, I discovered some surprising results.

In the past, Senator Boxer has voted:

YES - on loosening restrictions regarding wire tapping of YOUR phone
(Seems a bit scary to me.)

YES - on Congressional pay raises (2009)
(In this economy? Not exactly a move reflecting political genius.)

YES - on allowing illegal immigrants to participate in Social Security
(WTF?)

YES - on automatic visas for skilled workers
(Really? When lots of skilled American citizens are unemployed?)


NO - on limiting Congressional gifts
(Tells me she is enrolled in the 'Gifts for Favorable Votes' program)

NO - on establishing committee to oversee Public Integrity
(See above 'NO' vote on limiting Congressional gifts.)

NO - on banning Partial Birth Abortions
(I am Pro-Choice. I am Anti-Baby Torture. Please
Google 'Partial Birth Abortions' for a reality check.)

NO - on Balanced Budget Amendment (1997)
(Huh?)

NO - on limiting welfare for illegal immigrants
(Seriously?)


Just sayin.....